mj's part time coding 2022 Q2
8 unresolved threads
8 unresolved threads
Compare changes
- mj authored
mj-part-time-2022-q2.md
0 → 100644
+ 100
− 0
Over the last 3 month period, I've been fully focused on developing my [tsqsim](https://github.com/mj-xmr/tsqsim) tool for Monero Research Lab's [OSPEAD](https://ccs.getmonero.org/proposals/Rucknium-OSPEAD-Fortifying-Monero-Against-Statistical-Attack.html) project. Even though I did occasionally review new code in Monero Core and GUI, a few members noted that since I was being focused on the tool so much, they felt developer resources being dragged away from Core/GUI. I'd gladly take it as a compliment :>
Therefore in the next 3 months, I'd like to catch up with the usual maintenance. Additionally, I'd like to continue enabling new devs, by pointing them to documentation, explaining and extending it. Previously, I was helping new devs in the #monero-dev channel. Just recently I noticed, that there's quite a crowd awaiting directions in the Recruitment Matrix Channel, formed at the end of last year by @Rucknium (correct me if I'm wrong). I promised them, that I'd be available from March for either 1-on-1 sessions or to answer general questions in the channel.
A special sub-task of the quarter would be benchmarking the tsqsim, requested by @selsta and @bigbklynballs. Even though C and C++ remain the fastest languages (yielding only to Assembler), I'm of the opinion, that the USP of tsqsim is the ability of setting up controlled experiments, without the need of them to be coded by the Researcher. This fact will be reflected by the benchmark, or more generally then: a comparison. While the user @bigbklynballs suggested benchmarking tsqsim against [all of his proposed 10 alternatives](https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/ffa8bb5c2f97fd1ff5b9990a70f139ad96586270), which were: